Key Differences
In short — FX-8350 outperforms Pentium 2117U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8350 is 52 days newer than Pentium 2117U.
Advantages of Intel Pentium 2117U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 17 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Performs up to 5% better in Rust than Pentium 2117U - 155 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium 2117U - 8 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
155
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$185
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3881 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium 2117U | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Pentium | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |