Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms Pentium 2117U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2798 days newer than Pentium 2117U.
Advantages of Intel Pentium 2117U
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 17 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 37% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Pentium 2117U - 584 vs 427 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium 2117U - 16 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
584
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 195 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium 2117U | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |