Key Differences
In short — Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core Ultra 9 185H is 2359 days newer than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
- Performs up to 12% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than EPYC 7551P - 221 vs 197 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core Ultra 9 185H - 64 vs 22 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Dec 14th, 2023
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
---|---|---|
Dec 14th, 2023 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
Ultra 9 | Collection | EPYC |
METEOR LAKE | Codename | Naples |
Intel BGA 2049 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
16 | Cores | 32 |
22 | Threads | 64 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 180 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 128EU | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |