Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Core M-5Y51 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 2626 days newer than Core M-5Y51.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than Core M-5Y51 - 203 vs 200 FPS
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
203
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Oct 27th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core M-5Y51 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 27th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core M | Collection | Celeron |
Broadwell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel BGA 1234 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
4 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 5300 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |