Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9920X outperforms the cheaper Pentium G3258 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9920X is 1600 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G3258.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 12% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Pentium G3258 - 131 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3258 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3258
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i9-9920X - $119.01 vs $300.15
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 53 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $300.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 80 minutes ago
Buy for $119.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Single-Core
613
43.38287331917905%
Multi-Core
1074
11.37470874814658%
Intel Core i9-9920X | vs | Intel Pentium G3258 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | Pentium |
Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
165 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |