Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G3258 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G3258 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 1417 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G3258.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3258
- Up to 42% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600 - $49.92 vs $85.76
- Up to 37% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 5 2600 - $0.32 vs $0.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 8% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Pentium G3258 - 168 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3258 - 12 vs 2 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FPS
155
92%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$49.92
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $49.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 177 minutes ago
Buy for $85.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 178 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3258 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Pentium | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |