Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10400F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-9920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10400F is 559 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-9920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 1% better in God of War than Core i9-9920X - 175 vs 174 FPS
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-9920X - $99.95 vs $587.46
- Up to 83% better value when playing God of War than Core i9-9920X - $0.57 vs $3.38 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 65 vs 165 Watts
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $587.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17939 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
175
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17939 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9920X | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |