Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KS is 185 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KS
- Performs up to 4% better in World of Warcraft than Core i3-10320 - 195 vs 187 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i9-9900KS - $120.0 vs $545.0
- Up to 77% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i9-9900KS - $0.64 vs $2.79 per FPS
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KS - 65 vs 127 Watts
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $545 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 195 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
187
95%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, $
$120
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 194 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900KS | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Oct 28th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
127 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |