Buy on Amazon
$362
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $423
Availability
MSRP in USD: $423
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900 is 2332 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 17% better in Valorant than Celeron G1610 - 799 vs 681 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i9-9900 - $37.0 vs $362.0
- Up to 89% better value when playing Valorant than Core i9-9900 - $0.05 vs $0.45 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Intel Core i9-9900 Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.0GHz LGA1151 300 Series 65W
Buy for $362 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 118 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 117 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i9-9900
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
