Key Differences
In short — Core i9-8950HK outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-8950HK is 1432 days newer than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-8950HK
- Performs up to 3% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Celeron G1840 - 217 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 12 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i9-8950HK
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2018
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-8950HK | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| Not Available | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
