Key Differences
In short — Core i9-8950HK outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-8950HK is 214 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-8950HK
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 131 vs 128 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-8950HK - 16 vs 12 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
128
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.86/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-8950HK | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |