Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 1960 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 13% better in New World than Core i7-3770 - 114 vs 101 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - $95.0 vs $556.54
- Up to 81% better value when playing New World than Core i9-7920X - $0.94 vs $4.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 45% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 77 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
114
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.88/FPS
19%
Price, $
$556.54
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for $556.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
Buy for $95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7920X | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |