Buy on Amazon
$547.2
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 1147 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 4% better in DOOM Eternal than Core i3-4160T - 486 vs 469 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Core i9-7920X
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
486
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.13/FPS
100%
Price, $
$547.2
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-7920X X-Series Processor 12 Cores up to 4.3 GHz Turbo Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 140W
Buy for $547.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 175 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Core i9-7920X
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7920X | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 140 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
