Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 1833 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 14% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i3-3220T - 112 vs 98 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220T - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220T
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - $59.4 vs $329.0
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $329 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 182 minutes ago
Buy for $59.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 177 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
458
33.577712609970675%
Multi-Core
941
10.33838716765546%
Intel Core i9-7920X | vs | Intel Core i3-3220T |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |