Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 3116 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220T
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i9-11900 - $59.4 vs $259.95
- Up to 75% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i9-11900 - $0.35 vs $1.38 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 12% better in Deathloop than Core i3-3220T - 188 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220T - 16 vs 4 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
168
89.36170212765957%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.4
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $59.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
188
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.38/FPS
25.36231884057971%
Price, $
$259.95
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for $259.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
458
21.502347417840376%
Multi-Core
941
10.673774954627948%
Intel Core i3-3220T | vs | Intel Core i9-11900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | No |