Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 221 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 2% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 5 2600X - 130 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - $99.97 vs $557.04
- Up to 82% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-7920X - $0.78 vs $4.28 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 95 vs 140 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
130
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.28/FPS
18%
Price, $
$557.04
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for $557.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17360 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
128
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17360 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7920X | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Skylake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |