Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 1783 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 6% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than FX-8300 - 177 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - $100.0 vs $554.39
- Up to 81% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i9-7920X - $0.6 vs $3.13 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 95 vs 140 Watts
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
177
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.13/FPS
19%
Price, $
$554.39
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for $554.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7920X | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |