Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 2160 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 6% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-8120 - 158 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - $78.02 vs $329.0
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 125 vs 140 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $329 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 194 minutes ago
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7920X | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |