Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7900X outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7900X is 1707 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7900X
- Performs up to 12% better in Battlefield 2042 than FX-8350 - 162 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i9-7900X - $185.0 vs $412.83
- Up to 50% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i9-7900X - $1.28 vs $2.55 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i9-7900X - 125 vs 140 Watts
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
162
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.55/FPS
50%
Price, $
$412.83
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for $412.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3654 minutes ago
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3653 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7900X | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |