Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 4094 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 147% better in Counter-Strike 2 than FX-8320 - 583 vs 236 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-14900 - $74.82 vs $609.23
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $609.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67570 minutes ago
Buy for $74.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67571 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900 | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |