Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 3222 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 17% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Celeron G1820 - 208 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $46.41 vs $463.65
- Up to 88% better value when playing Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i9-13900K - $0.26 vs $2.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 53 vs 125 Watts
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
208
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.23/FPS
11%
Price, $
$463.65
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for $463.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
178
85%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900K | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 53 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |