Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900K is 1874 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 89% better in The Callisto Protocol than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 198 vs 105 FPS
- Up to 20% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $460.74 vs $576.53
- Up to 58% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $2.33 vs $5.49 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
198
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$460.74
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $460.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 184 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
105
53%
Value, $/FPS
$5.49/FPS
42%
Price, $
$576.53
79%
Buy for $576.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 185 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |