Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Pentium G640 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G640 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3867 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G640.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 47% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Pentium G640 - 132 vs 90 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G640 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G640
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $42.25 vs $509.24
- Up to 88% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-13900F - $0.47 vs $3.86 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $509.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 115 minutes ago
Buy for $42.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 115 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Pentium G640 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jun 3rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Pentium |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |