Buy on Amazon
$435
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $524
Availability
MSRP in USD: $524
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3964 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 4% better in Control than FX-6200 - 207 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 32 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
207
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$435
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-13900F Desktop Processor 24 cores (8 P-cores + 16 E-cores) 36MB Cache, up to 5.6 GHz
Buy for $435 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 191 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
| Core i9 | Collection | FX |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 3 |
32 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Core i9-13900F or FX-6200
Control, 1920 x 1080, High
91 FPS
$18.67/FPS
GeForce RTX 4060
Core i9-13900F
32 GB, 2 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,699
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
