Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-9700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-9700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1352 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-9700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 11% better in Valheim than Core i7-9700F - 226 vs 203 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $260.0 vs $419.95
- Up to 31% better value when playing Valheim than Core i9-13900F - $1.28 vs $1.86 per FPS
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
226
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.86/FPS
68.81720430107526%
Price, $
$419.95
61%
FPS Winner
Buy for $419.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
203
89.82300884955751%
Value, $/FPS
$1.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$260
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $260 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Single-Core
1549
56.73992673992674%
Multi-Core
6256
36.33195888262966%
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |