Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7600.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 38% better in Starfield than Core i5-7600 - 80 vs 58 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $135.97 vs $435.0
- Up to 57% better value when playing Starfield than Core i9-13900F - $2.34 vs $5.44 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $435 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
58
72%
Value, $/FPS
$2.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$135.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $135.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i5-7600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |