Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1277 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 2% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Ryzen 5 3600X - 241 vs 236 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3600X - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $190.0 vs $435.0
- Up to 55% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i9-13900F - $0.81 vs $1.8 per FPS
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $435 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51429 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
236
97.9253112033195%
Value, $/FPS
$0.81/FPS
100%
Price, $
$190
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $190 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51430 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1642
60.146520146520146%
Multi-Core
7000
40.65276729194495%
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |