Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 4140 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 110% better in War Thunder than Celeron G540 - 269 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Up to 96% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - $19.25 vs $542.61
- Up to 93% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i9-13900 - $0.15 vs $2.02 per FPS
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
269
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.02/FPS
7.425742574257425%
Price, $
$542.61
3%
FPS Winner
Buy for $542.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
128
47.58364312267658%
Value, $/FPS
$0.15/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.25
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $19.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Single-Core
396
14.591009579955786%
Multi-Core
679
4.133690490685499%
Intel Core i9-13900 | vs | Intel Celeron G540 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |