Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 4426 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Up to 96% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $19.25 vs $521.99
- Up to 93% better value when playing HITMAN 2 than Core i9-14900KF - $0.17 vs $2.45 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 94% better in HITMAN 2 than Celeron G540 - 213 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 32 vs 2 threads
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
110
51%
Value, $/FPS
$0.17/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.25
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $19.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
213
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.45/FPS
6%
Price, $
$521.99
3%
FPS Winner
Buy for $521.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G540 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |