Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 4148 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Up to 97% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - $19.25 vs $575.0
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 166% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron G540 - 606 vs 228 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 32 vs 2 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $19.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76931 minutes ago
Buy for $575 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76932 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Single-Core
396
12.753623188405797%
Multi-Core
679
3.1099711445976275%
Intel Celeron G540 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 150 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |