Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 2167 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Up to 97% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $19.25 vs $624.95
- Up to 96% better value when playing HITMAN 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $0.17 vs $4.7 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 21% better in HITMAN 2 than Celeron G540 - 133 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 32 vs 2 threads
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
110
82.70676691729322%
Value, $/FPS
$0.17/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.25
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $19.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2210 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
133
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.7/FPS
3.6170212765957452%
Price, $
$624.95
3%
FPS Winner
Buy for $624.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2215 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G540 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |