Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10920X is 104 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10920X
- Performs up to 8% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 5 3400G - 181 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-10920X - $98.15 vs $799.0
- Up to 87% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-10920X - $0.58 vs $4.41 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-10920X - 65 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $799 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5898 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
168
92%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.15
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5898 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10920X | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |