Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10920X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10920X is 194 days older than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10920X
- Performs up to 2% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i5-10400F - 301 vs 295 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-10920X - $99.95 vs $799.0
- Up to 87% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i9-10920X - $0.34 vs $2.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-10920X - 65 vs 165 Watts
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $799 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6207 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
295
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6207 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10920X | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Core i5 |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |