Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10920X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10920X is 194 days older than the cheaper Core i5-10400.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10920X
- Performs up to 9% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-10400 - 401 vs 368 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400 - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-10920X - $123.59 vs $899.0
- Up to 85% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-10920X - $0.34 vs $2.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-10920X - 65 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
401
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.24/FPS
15.178571428571427%
Price, $
$899
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for $899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51186 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
368
91.77057356608479%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$123.59
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $123.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51187 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1430
85.37313432835822%
Multi-Core
5489
48.36549475724733%
Intel Core i9-10920X | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Core i5 |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |