Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 994 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 2% better in DOOM Eternal than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 489 vs 478 FPS
- Up to 85% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $123.59 vs $819.3
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400 - 32 vs 12 threads
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Buy for $123.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74141 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
478
97.75051124744377%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
$819.3
15%
Buy for $819.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74142 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |