Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10920X is 548 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10920X
- Performs up to 7% better in Remnant II than Ryzen 5 2600 - 91 vs 85 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-10920X - $140.0 vs $899.0
- Up to 83% better value when playing Remnant II than Core i9-10920X - $1.65 vs $9.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-10920X - 65 vs 165 Watts
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
91
100%
Value, $/FPS
$9.88/FPS
16.700404858299592%
Price, $
$899
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for $899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51178 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
85
93.4065934065934%
Value, $/FPS
$1.65/FPS
100%
Price, $
$140
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51179 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1152
68.77611940298507%
Multi-Core
4841
42.65574059388492%
Intel Core i9-10920X | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |