Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 381 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 3% better in HITMAN 3 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 203 vs 198 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 165 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - $197.65 vs $615.0
- Up to 67% better value when playing HITMAN 3 than Core i9-10900X - $1.0 vs $3.03 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900X - 24 vs 20 threads
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $615 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 208 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
198
97%
Value, $/FPS
$1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$197.65
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $197.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 208 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 12 |
20 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |