Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Core i9-10900X vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

Core i9-10900X vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-10900X

3.7 GHz | 10-core

Intel Core i9-10900X Logo
Intel Core i9-10900X Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 4.7GHz Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 165W (BX8069510900X)

Buy for $565 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 73838 minutes ago

vs

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

3.4 GHz | 16-core

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Logo
AMD YD195XA8AEWOF Ryzen Threadripper 1950X (16-core/32-thread) Desktop Processor

Buy for $819.3 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 73839 minutes ago

FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-10900X

3.7 GHz | 10-core

Intel Core i9-10900X Logo
Intel Core i9-10900X Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 4.7GHz Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 165W (BX8069510900X)

Buy for $565 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 73838 minutes ago

vs

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

3.4 GHz | 16-core

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Logo
AMD YD195XA8AEWOF Ryzen Threadripper 1950X (16-core/32-thread) Desktop Processor

Buy for $819.3 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 73839 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 800 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.

Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X

  • Performs up to 2% better in Stray than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 185 vs 182 FPS
  • Up to 31% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $565.0 vs $819.3
  • Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 165 vs 180 Watts

Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900X - 32 vs 20 threads
This is a free version of Stray.
Stray

Stray

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

High

Intel Core i9-10900X Logo
Core i9-10900X

Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019


FPS

185

100%

Value, $/FPS

Price, $

$565

100%

FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-10900X Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 4.7GHz Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 165W (BX8069510900X)

Buy for $565 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 73838 minutes ago

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Logo
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017


FPS

182

98.37837837837839%

Value, $/FPS

Price, $

$819.3

68%

AMD YD195XA8AEWOF Ryzen Threadripper 1950X (16-core/32-thread) Desktop Processor

Buy for $819.3 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 73839 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

High

Intel Core i9-10900X Logo
Core i9-10900X

Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Logo
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Core i9-10900X Logo
Core i9-10900X

Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019


Single-Core

1576

100%

Multi-Core

9371

100%

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Logo
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017


Single-Core

1171

74.30203045685279%

Multi-Core

7539

80.45032547220147%

Intel Core i9-10900X Logo

Intel Core i9-10900X

vs
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Logo

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

Oct 19th, 2019
Release DateAug 10th, 2017
Core i9 ExtremeCollectionRyzen Threadripper
Cascade LakeCodenameWhitehaven
Intel Socket 2066SocketAMD Socket SP3r2
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
10Cores
16
20Threads
32
3.7 GHz
Base Clock Speed3.4 GHz
4.5 GHz
Turbo Clock Speed4.0 GHz
165 W
TDP180 W
14 nmProcess Size14 nm
37.0x
Multiplier34.0x
NoneIntegrated GraphicsNone
YesOverclockableYes

Builds Using Core i9-10900X or Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

Stray, 1920 x 1080, High

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.