Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1173 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $615.0 vs $899.99
- Up to 30% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i5-13400F - $2.62 vs $3.75 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 20 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 2% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i9-10900X - 240 vs 235 FPS
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
235
97%
Value, $/FPS
$2.62/FPS
100%
Price, $
$615
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $615 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2775 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
240
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.75/FPS
69%
Price, $
$899.99
68%
FPS Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2774 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900X | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Core i5 |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 10 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
165 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |