Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 7% better in Battlefield IV than Core i9-10900 - 458 vs 429 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $275.98 vs $899.99
- Up to 68% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i5-13400F - $0.64 vs $1.97 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
458
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.97/FPS
32%
Price, $
$899.99
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17980 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
429
93%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, $
$275.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $275.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17981 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |