Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2061 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 6% better in Deathloop than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 182 vs 172 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 105 vs 125 Watts
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-10900K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900K | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 10 | Cores | 10 |
| 20 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
