Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $225.0 vs $899.99
- Up to 73% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i5-13400F - $1.65 vs $6.16 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 20 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 7% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i9-10900F - 146 vs 136 FPS
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
136
93%
Value, $/FPS
$1.65/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15385 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
146
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.16/FPS
26%
Price, $
$899.99
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15384 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 10 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |