Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 13% better in Overwatch 2 than FX-6300 - 360 vs 319 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 20 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $58.02 vs $217.99
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $217.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75413 minutes ago
Buy for $58.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75412 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 6 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |