Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 162 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Athlon 3000G - 193 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $98.79 vs $222.99
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $222.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
Buy for $98.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
57.10023866348448%
Multi-Core
1975
23.43935437930216%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Athlon |
Comet Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |