Buy on Amazon
$225
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $556
Availability
MSRP in USD: $556
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Core i9-10885H on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 28 days newer than Core i9-10885H.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10885H
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 1% better in Elden Ring than Core i9-10885H - 124 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10885H - 20 vs 16 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
124
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.81/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1924 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i9-10885H
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10885H | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 10 |
| 16 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
