Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 1791 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 8% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron G3900 - 181 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - $39.9 vs $279.0
- Up to 84% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i9-10850K - $0.24 vs $1.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 51 vs 125 Watts
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $279 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3461 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
167
92%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3460 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10850K | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |