Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-990X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-990X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 3353 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-990X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-990X
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $178.02 vs $222.99
- Up to 15% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i9-10900F - $0.77 vs $0.91 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i7-990X - 246 vs 231 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-990X - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-990X - 20 vs 12 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 24th, 2011
FPS
231
93.90243902439023%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
100%
Price, $
$178.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 166 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
246
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.91/FPS
84.61538461538461%
Price, $
$222.99
79%
FPS Winner
Buy for $222.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 167 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 24th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 24th, 2011
Single-Core
565
33.711217183770884%
Multi-Core
2626
31.165440303821505%
Intel Core i7-990X | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Feb 24th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Gulftown | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |