Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-980X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 4312 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-980X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-980X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 14% better in Ready or Not than Core i7-980X - 272 vs 238 FPS
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i7-980X - $49.99 vs $148.02
- Up to 71% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i7-980X - $0.18 vs $0.62 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-980X doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $148.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
272
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
Price, $
$49.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-980X | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Gulftown | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |