Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700T outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700T is 1688 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700T
- Performs up to 12% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 555 vs 495 FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700T - 20 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-9700T
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700T | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 8 | Cores | 10 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
