Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Pentium G645 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G645 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 2424 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G645.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 21% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Pentium G645 - 131 vs 108 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G645 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - $40.99 vs $260.0
- Up to 81% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i7-9700F - $0.38 vs $1.98 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
131
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.98/FPS
19.191919191919194%
Price, $
$260
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for $260 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 142 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
FPS
108
82.44274809160305%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$40.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $40.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Single-Core
465
30.019367333763718%
Multi-Core
800
12.787723785166241%
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | Intel Pentium G645 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Pentium |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |